Quantcast

Great Lakes Wire

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

Michigan AG defends utility bill savings at state supreme court

Webp ra75x9fr0nmpiokrw1l42h2b8497

Attorney General Dana Nessel | Official website

Attorney General Dana Nessel | Official website

Last week, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel successfully defended utility bill savings for Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M) customers at the Michigan Supreme Court. The appeal followed a March 2021 application that I&M filed with the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) seeking to recover millions of dollars incurred to purchase or produce electric power for its customers in Michigan. Part of these costs included money I&M paid an affiliate power generator. The Attorney General intervened and argued that I&M paid more than comparable market prices for the power from its own affiliate, a "sweetheart deal" with itself, violating MPSC rules for utility transactions with affiliate companies.

In February 2023, the MPSC agreed with the Attorney General and disallowed $1.347 million, saving customers from unreasonable costs and forcing I&M’s shareholders to bear the costs of this "sweetheart deal." I&M appealed the MPSC’s order to the Michigan Court of Appeals. In January of this year, the Court of Appeals agreed with the Attorney General and affirmed the MPSC’s decision. I&M then filed an application for leave to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court seeking to overturn the Court of Appeals decision.

Last week, the Michigan Supreme Court denied I&M’s request, reaffirming savings for I&M customers.

This lengthy exchange in courts is likely to benefit efforts in defending another $11.2 million in savings for I&M customers. In that application, Attorney General Nessel successfully convinced the MPSC in May to disallow a similar "sweetheart deal" where the company attempted to profit at customers' expense by passing along inflated business-to-business purchase prices of power from an affiliate company. I&M filed a rehearing petition with the MPSC on this additional $11.2 million. The Attorney General opposed this rehearing petition and parties are currently awaiting a ruling.

"I’m gratified the Michigan Supreme Court rejected I&M’s request for further review of the Court of Appeals decision," Nessel said. "The Commission got it right both times, acting in agreement with my department’s concerns and shielding customers from I&M’s self-serving profit scheme."

Since taking office, Attorney General Nessel has helped save Michigan consumers nearly $3 billion by intervening in utility cases before the MPSC.

I&M sells electricity to approximately 133,000 customers in southwestern Michigan.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS